Patients' ethical obligation for their health.

نویسندگان

  • R C Sider
  • C D Clements
چکیده

In contemporary medical ethics health is rarely acknowledged to be an ethical obligation. This oversight is due to the preoccupation of most bioethicists with a rationalist, contract model for ethics in which moral obligation is limited to truth-telling and promise-keeping. Such an ethics is poorly suited to medicine because it fails to appreciate that medicine's basis as a moral enterprise is oriented towards health values. A naturalistic model for medical ethics is proposed which builds upon biological and medical values. This perspective clarifies ethical obligations to ourselves and to others for life and health. It provides a normative framework for the doctor-patient relationship within which to formulate medical advice and by which to evaluate patient choice.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Conflict of Jurisprudential Rules and the Obligation of Self-Preservation with Ethical Standards in the Care and Management of Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Common sense, according to rules such as no harm and no harm, the obligation to repel probable harm, the denial of embarrassment, the sanctity of induction in motion, the repulsion of harm from oneself is rationally and religiously obligatory, whether harmful or rationally possible; on the other hand in the teachings Islamic ethics embodies concepts such as self-sacrifice, compassion, cooperati...

متن کامل

The quality improvement-research divide and the need for external oversight.

Historically, quality assurance studies have received scant ethical attention. The advent of information systems capable of supporting research-grade continuous quality improvement projects demands that we clearly define how these projects differ from research and when they require external review. The ethical obligation for the performance of quality assurance projects, with its emphasis on id...

متن کامل

A rejection of doctors as moral guides.

The chairman of the Patients Association, a British advocacy group, responds to Roger C. Sider and Colleen D. Clements' essay in this issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics on a patient's moral obligation to preserve his or her health. She rejects their implication that, because of this obligation to oneself, there also is an obligation to follow the advice of one's doctor. Agreeing that soci...

متن کامل

Patients' autonomy and medical benefit: ethical reasoning among GPs.

BACKGROUND During the last decades, the traditional role of GPs as decision-makers for their patients has been questioned. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to identify and discuss how GPs deal with and how they reason in situations where there is a possible tension between the obligation to respect the patients' right to self-determination and the obligation to promote their health. MET...

متن کامل

New technologies in health care. Part 1: A moral and ethical predicament.

With the rapid evolution of technology and the development and marketing of new procedures in dentistry, dentists have difficulty keeping pace with all of this new technology and information. How do these clinicians know whether a new product, technique or technological advance is good and should be recommended? At what point do they have an obligation to inform their patients about new procedu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of medical ethics

دوره 10 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1984